EcoMark analysis · Algo v4

theclimatecoalition.org

Published 28 Aug 2026

Site history
C70#2 of 2 at publication

This grade belongs to theclimatecoalition.org. It is based on a bounded sample of up to 5 connected public pages plus public evidence. It is not a grade for any one page.

Automated EcoMark v4 approximation using up to 5 connected pages, DNS, active policy/sitemap discovery, browser security checks and lightweight performance diagnostics. Analysis quality: limited.

Algorithm v4 · Raw evidence

Improve

Start with these changes.

1

responsibility

Publish clearly linked privacy, terms, accessibility and contact information, plus a public registration identifier where applicable.

Transparent, secure defaults make digital impact understandable and give visitors meaningful choices.

2

efficiency

Add long-lived cache headers to versioned static assets.

Lighter pages consume less bandwidth and device work and remain usable on slower connections.

3

accessibility

Fix basic document semantics: language, one clear H1 and meaningful landmarks/headings.

Accessible, resilient markup works for more people, assistive technology and older or constrained devices.

Breakdown

Evidence by category.

Efficiency

65
#1 of 2

1 connected pages · ~113 KB measured/page · 52 KB JavaScript/page · 45 resource references/page · 0% sampled assets cacheable. PageSpeed-style checks: 5/7; 0 obvious blocking candidates; 0 images without width/height.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 1 connected pages · ~113 KB measured/page · 52 KB JavaScript/page · 45 resource references/page · 0% sampled assets cacheable. PageSpeed-style checks: 5/7; 0 obvious blocking candidates; 0 images without width/height.

  • PayloadMeasured HTML and sampled asset payload is proportionate and optimised.20/20
  • JavaScriptReferenced JavaScript weight is kept proportionate.20/20
  • RequestsPages avoid excessive resource references and third-party connections.10/20
  • MediaImages and video avoid obvious loading and autoplay waste.15/20
  • Caching and compressionSampled static assets expose effective cache policy.0/20

Privacy

75
#2 of 2

4 known trackers · 0 tracking-style response cookies · 0% third-party resource references.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 4 known trackers · 0 tracking-style response cookies · 0% third-party resource references.

  • Behavioural trackingKnown advertising pixels and cross-site trackers are absent or minimised.5/20
  • Analytics minimisationAnalytics technology is absent or privacy-preserving and proportionate.10/20
  • Cookies and consentNon-essential response cookies are avoided before interaction.20/20
  • Third-party disclosureResource loading does not unnecessarily disclose visits to third parties.20/20
  • Invasive techniquesKnown session replay and similarly invasive tools are absent.20/20

Sovereignty

95
#1 of 2

1 US-headquartered visitor-facing provider ecosystems · 100% first-party assets · open technology 90/100 · no framework signal required/detected. DNS: NS ns3.meganameservers.eu, ns2.meganameservers.eu · MX 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com, 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com · CNAME proxy-05b86f87047461da66d30f5b.nationbuilder.com.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 1 US-headquartered visitor-facing provider ecosystems · 100% first-party assets · open technology 90/100 · no framework signal required/detected. DNS: NS ns3.meganameservers.eu, ns2.meganameservers.eu · MX 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com, 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com · CNAME proxy-05b86f87047461da66d30f5b.nationbuilder.com.

  • Provider jurisdictionObservable visitor-facing dependencies minimise reliance on US-headquartered platform ecosystems.15/20
  • Third-party geographyKnown non-EU third-party data exposure is minimised.20/20
  • Portable deliveryPages minimise proprietary embeds and platform-specific content dependencies.20/20
  • Supplier concentrationThird-party resource loading is not dominated by one provider ecosystem.20/20
  • Open technologyOpen standards, first-party delivery, open-source technology and public source code are preferred where practical.20/20

Accessibility

65
#2 of 2

3 semantic issues · 0 keyboard markup issues · 0% unlabelled controls · 24% raw/rendered text ratio.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 3 semantic issues · 0 keyboard markup issues · 0% unlabelled controls · 24% raw/rendered text ratio.

  • SemanticsHTML exposes basic language, heading and landmark structure.5/20
  • Keyboard accessMarkup avoids obvious keyboard-hostile interaction patterns.20/20
  • Forms and controlsForm controls expose labels or accessible names.20/20
  • Visual accessibilityViewport and media markup avoid obvious visual accessibility barriers.15/20
  • ResilienceMeaningful text remains present without relying entirely on client rendering.5/20

Responsibility

40
#2 of 2

Privacy ✗ · Cookies ✗ · Terms ✗ · Accessibility ✗ · Contact/About ✗. Public registration IDs: none detected. no verified green-hosting evidence found. carbon.txt ✗ · sitemap ✗ · security 5/6. Missing: HSTS.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: Privacy ✗ · Cookies ✗ · Terms ✗ · Accessibility ✗ · Contact/About ✗. Public registration IDs: none detected. no verified green-hosting evidence found. carbon.txt ✗ · sitemap ✗ · security 5/6. Missing: HSTS.

  • Public accountabilityPrivacy, terms, accessibility, contact and applicable registration information are discoverable.0/20
  • Security basicsThe main response exposes sensible browser security headers.15/20
  • Consent designTracking and consent markup avoids obvious one-sided choice patterns.5/20
  • Supplier disclosureDetected material visitor-facing providers are reflected in discoverable privacy information.20/20
  • Sustainability evidenceGreen hosting, carbon.txt and public sustainability information provide discoverable evidence of digital sustainability practice.0/20