EcoMark

EcoMark analysis · Algo v4

hopeforthefuture.org.uk

Published 30 Aug 2026

Site history
C78#4 of 9 at publication

This grade belongs to hopeforthefuture.org.uk. It is based on a bounded sample of up to 5 connected public pages plus public evidence. It is not a grade for any one page.

Automated EcoMark v4 approximation using up to 5 connected pages, DNS, active policy/sitemap discovery, browser security checks and lightweight performance diagnostics. Browser Run was blocked or incomplete, so the normal public HTML response was used instead. Analysis quality: good.

Algorithm v4 · Raw evidence

Improve

Start with these changes.

1

responsibility

Add or strengthen these basic browser protections: HSTS, Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Frame protection.

Transparent, secure defaults make digital impact understandable and give visitors meaningful choices.

2

efficiency

Lazy-load below-the-fold media and remove autoplay.

Lighter pages consume less bandwidth and device work and remain usable on slower connections.

3

accessibility

Give every form control a programmatic label or accessible name.

Accessible, resilient markup works for more people, assistive technology and older or constrained devices.

Breakdown

Evidence by category.

Efficiency

60
#7 of 9

5 connected pages · ~1318 KB measured/page · 105 KB JavaScript/page · 30 resource references/page · 100% sampled assets cacheable. PageSpeed-style checks: 5/7; 1 obvious blocking candidates; 0 images without width/height.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 5 connected pages · ~1318 KB measured/page · 105 KB JavaScript/page · 30 resource references/page · 100% sampled assets cacheable. PageSpeed-style checks: 5/7; 1 obvious blocking candidates; 0 images without width/height.

  • PayloadMeasured HTML and sampled asset payload is proportionate and optimised.10/20
  • JavaScriptReferenced JavaScript weight is kept proportionate.15/20
  • RequestsPages avoid excessive resource references and third-party connections.15/20
  • MediaImages and video avoid obvious loading and autoplay waste.0/20
  • Caching and compressionSampled static assets expose effective cache policy.20/20

Privacy

100
#1 of 9

0 known trackers · 0 tracking-style response cookies · 0% third-party resource references.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 0 known trackers · 0 tracking-style response cookies · 0% third-party resource references.

  • Behavioural trackingKnown advertising pixels and cross-site trackers are absent or minimised.20/20
  • Analytics minimisationAnalytics technology is absent or privacy-preserving and proportionate.20/20
  • Cookies and consentNon-essential response cookies are avoided before interaction.20/20
  • Third-party disclosureResource loading does not unnecessarily disclose visits to third parties.20/20
  • Invasive techniquesKnown session replay and similarly invasive tools are absent.20/20

Sovereignty

95
#1 of 9

1 US-headquartered visitor-facing provider ecosystems · 100% first-party assets · open technology 90/100 · no framework signal required/detected. DNS: NS etta.ns.cloudflare.com, lex.ns.cloudflare.com · CNAME hopeforthefuture.org.uk.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 1 US-headquartered visitor-facing provider ecosystems · 100% first-party assets · open technology 90/100 · no framework signal required/detected. DNS: NS etta.ns.cloudflare.com, lex.ns.cloudflare.com · CNAME hopeforthefuture.org.uk.

  • Provider jurisdictionObservable visitor-facing dependencies minimise reliance on US-headquartered platform ecosystems.15/20
  • Third-party geographyKnown non-EU third-party data exposure is minimised.20/20
  • Portable deliveryPages minimise proprietary embeds and platform-specific content dependencies.20/20
  • Supplier concentrationThird-party resource loading is not dominated by one provider ecosystem.20/20
  • Open technologyOpen standards, first-party delivery, open-source technology and public source code are preferred where practical.20/20

Accessibility

70
#8 of 9

2 semantic issues · 0 keyboard markup issues · 33% unlabelled controls · 100% raw/rendered text ratio.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: 2 semantic issues · 0 keyboard markup issues · 33% unlabelled controls · 100% raw/rendered text ratio.

  • SemanticsHTML exposes basic language, heading and landmark structure.10/20
  • Keyboard accessMarkup avoids obvious keyboard-hostile interaction patterns.20/20
  • Forms and controlsForm controls expose labels or accessible names.0/20
  • Visual accessibilityViewport and media markup avoid obvious visual accessibility barriers.20/20
  • ResilienceMeaningful text remains present without relying entirely on client rendering.20/20

Responsibility

55
#7 of 9

Privacy ✓ · Cookies n/a · Terms ✗ · Accessibility ✓ · Contact/About ✓. Public registration IDs: UK charity number 1173547. no verified green-hosting evidence found. carbon.txt ✗ · sitemap ✓ · security 1/6. Missing: HSTS, Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Frame protection.

Evidence and scoring

Evidence: Privacy ✓ · Cookies n/a · Terms ✗ · Accessibility ✓ · Contact/About ✓. Public registration IDs: UK charity number 1173547. no verified green-hosting evidence found. carbon.txt ✗ · sitemap ✓ · security 1/6. Missing: HSTS, Content Security Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Frame protection.

  • Public accountabilityPrivacy, terms, accessibility, contact and applicable registration information are discoverable.15/20
  • Security basicsThe main response exposes sensible browser security headers.0/20
  • Consent designTracking and consent markup avoids obvious one-sided choice patterns.20/20
  • Supplier disclosureDetected material visitor-facing providers are reflected in discoverable privacy information.20/20
  • Sustainability evidenceGreen hosting, carbon.txt and public sustainability information provide discoverable evidence of digital sustainability practice.0/20